Yes it is not fair, i paid $2300 with iLife 09 outdated softwares. Only 1 month or bit more iLife'11 came out. Click to expand. Thats so cheap, apple should give a 60-day limit instead of oct 1st.
How To Download Ilife 11 For Mac Free
. Once upon a time, Apple used to charge for nearly all its software, and especially productivity apps like the iLife and iWork suites.
However, back in 2013, Apple made those apps free with the purchase of any new Mac or iOS device (see “,” 22 October 2013). Now, with no announcement or fanfare, Apple has made the current iLife and iWork apps entirely free for all users. Just to be clear, the change affects the following apps:. GarageBand for (requires 10.10 Yosemite) and (requires iOS 10.2). iMovie for (requires 10.11.2 El Capitan) and (requires iOS 9.3).
Keynote for (requires 10.12 Sierra) and (requires iOS 10). Numbers for (requires 10.12 Sierra) and (requires iOS 10). Pages for (requires 10.12 Sierra) and (requires iOS 10) This is good news for holdouts who haven’t purchased a new eligible Apple device since 2013 but are running a supported version of the operating system and would like copies of the iLife and iWork apps. And it makes explaining the pricing easier for Apple. Why didn’t Apple just make these apps free for everyone in the first place?
The answer likely lies deep within Apple’s accounting department. Back in 2013, Apple made iLife, iWork, and OS X 10.9 Mavericks free and bundled them with every new Mac and iOS device sold. That move enabled the company to delay recognition of a portion of its sales receipts. That’s because the product (a Mac or iOS device) wasn’t “fully delivered” without updates to the software — it’s a “subscription accounting” approach. In its Q4 2013 financial quarter, Apple delayed recognition of $900 million in revenue, in essence hiding that money from the quarterly report (see “,” 28 October 2013). That may answer the question of why Apple is now making these apps free for everyone., the deferred revenue trickles back into Apple’s reported revenues over 2 years for iOS and 4 years for the Mac. It has been about 4 years since this deferral likely began, implying that Apple has finally cleaned the associated deferred revenue off its books.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/iphoto11macOSSierra-57f81d295f9b586c356f1d77.jpg "How to get free ilife 11 for mac free")
In the end, this change doesn’t mean much. Any effects from iLife and iWork becoming free — on competing apps, on Apple’s revenues, and on the perceived value of Apple hardware, for instance — have already taken place. Most people who want to use the iLife and iWork apps have likely either bought copies already or purchased new hardware since October 2013.
We suspect that sales to owners of older Macs and iOS devices have dropped to the point where it was no longer worthwhile for Apple to bother charging for the apps anymore. But you have to remember that the entire point of making these apps — and the operating systems! — free was to add value to the hardware.
Apple has never made significant money on software; the lion's share of the revenue has always come from hardware. As long as the software encourages hardware sales in a real way, it will keep getting attention.
And, in fact, Aperture shows that charging money for an app makes no difference to Apple. My guess is that Apple will keep these apps going for a long time, but that users shouldn't expect the pace of development or innovation to compete with hungrier independent developers.
Actually your pessimism about the Mac no longer seems justified. For one thing, Apple's laptop line got an 'upgrade' recently. And current reports indicate a Mac Pro upgrade can be expected next year, with a return to an 'expandable' configuration.
In a rare bit of candor Apple admitted that the 'trash can' Mac Pro was a mistake. It's cute but turned out to be a technological dead end. There have been hints that the iMac is also in for a refresh, though how fresh that will be remains to be seen. Competition for the iMac from the Microsoft Surface Studio will be heating up in the not-to-distant future. Given that Apple claims not to be interested in a touch screen Mac, it's hard to see how their response to the Surface Studio will be anything but underwhelming. The touch-bar on the MacBook Pro is little more than a toy and would be ergonomically inappropriate on a desktop computer. Sadly there's no news about the Mac mini.
The mini may have the same problem the Mac Pro has: Thermal issues limit the amount of new hardware that can be included in the mini's diminutive box. But then the Mac mini was never intended to be a performance machine. Instead, it's a small office work horse. That is unlikely to change substantially.
That said, I agree with Adam that free iLife and iWork software is not bad news. And they will encourage adoption of Sierra on hardware that can support it. If your hardware is obsolete, well, to coin a phrase, that's not Apple's problem.
Indeed, iLife and iWork upgrades have been platform specific for some time now. In any case, older versions of those apps may be better in some ways than the new kids on the block.
New versions have tended to lose rather than gain features, a well established Apple hallmark. Free may seem like a good thing, but nothing is really free. In this case we will be paying for these apps through hardware purchases, if we use an app or not.
Then there is the question of app quality. Since Apple is not making any money off them anymore there is no stimulus to make these apps so good people will be willing to pay for them. The option to vote with our wallet has been taken from us. One sad example is the latest version of Numbers for iOS. The complaints and 1 star reviews are pouring in but Apple seems to be deaf and blind to them. Now that Numbers is free there is even less reason te expect Apple to do anything about this bad update. There is a fair amount of information on Wikipedia about the versions.
For instance: about Keynote: As much as it would be nice if Apple gave all old stuff away for free, or even kept old versions available for sale, I presume they've done the math and determined that it would be a significant expense that would benefit very few people because those who don't upgrade to new hardware tend not to buy (or even download) new software either. One of the basic corollaries of sticking with old hardware is that you shouldn't assume it will ever do things beyond what it could do when it stopped being supported. Macs stay functional for a long time, which is great, but they won't gain new capabilities (via new software) after a certain point, and they will start to lose functionality (through lack of compatibility with current software) after that.